Columbus prosecutors failed to mention vital details in deadly stabbing

As mentioned in my earlier article on this subject, in the stabbing death of  Amareyon Daniels, a gun was recovered on the crime scene, but nothing more was said about it. Whatever happened to it? Evidently, the gun was owned by Mr. Daniels. The hand injury that was sustain by Shavar Johnson was, in fact, a knife shot injury, which resulted in him missing a pinky finger. Why did the prosecutors, court records, and the media fail to mention these things to the public? This is very odd.

Some people in Mansfield , Ohio, who knew Daniels  believe that he must have did or said something, most likely pointed his gun at Johnson's girlfriend (Courtney Webb). The aforementioned people also said that Daniels used to terrorize the City of Mansfield, engaging in certain activities that I will not discuss here, because this is, however, an open court case. 

Moreover, I did find a picture on Facebook. The picture depicts Daniels holding a gun with an extended magazine, pointing down at some young woman's head. Therefore, there could be some truth to what some people are saying regarding Daniels. However, if what the prosecutors stated with regard to finding texts in Webb's phone -- texts that stated that Webb was going to set up Daniels., well, in that case, she should in deed face consequences for her actions. Remember, detectives found those texts in Webb's phone, not her boyfriend's phone. He probably had no knowledge of those texts. In other words, that means he was deceived into believing that Daniel's was trying to rape or rob Webb.

"Prosecutor said woman set up deadly stabbing with boyfriend", but is it entirely true

Picture of Shavar Johnson 

On 12\11\2024, Shavar Johnson, 23, and his girlfriend, Courtney Webb, 21, were arrested, in Columbus, Ohio, for the stabbing death of  22-year-old Amareyon Daniels. 

While prosecutors stated the obvious, that the tabbing death of Amareyon was entirely staged, however, they never considered that the co-defendant, Shavar Johnson, might have been set up as well, unknowingly used, deceived into believing that his girlfriend was being raped and robbed, which resulted in the stabbing death of  Mr. Daniels. According to some news sources, detectives acquired a warrant to search Webb's phone, whereupon they discovered text messages that stated:

"I'm going to hell after tonight because I don't let that mother****r get away after this. I'm about to set this mother****r up for real" 

The aforesaid text was sent to an unknown number hours before the stabbing took place. Detectives said that Webb accused Daniels of stealing weed and money from her. Interestingly enough, before this text message was released to the public, my aunt, and other people, believe that Webb screamed rape, prompting an urgency from Johnson to run to the passenger-side of the vehicle (where Daniels was sitting) and attacked Daniels. It is believed by many people, including me, both Johnson and Daniels were victims of a secret, selfish and twisted agenda. And as a result, one young man is deceased and the other is incarcerated. I sincerely believe that all of the aforesaid are what happened based on all of the articles that I've read as well as other reliable sources. So, two questions remain: Why isn't the spotlight completely on Webb? And whatever happened to the gun that was recovered on the scene, as revealed in the first few articles that covered this story? It's like the gun totally disappeared. No updates on fingerprints and to whom the gun belonged. 

We've all watched crime shows, like that of ID Channel, etc. And we've seen particularly men get used, manipulated or deceived into killing other men for women who had ill-intentions. This type of thing happens more often than not. Unfortunately, this appears to be the same deception of which Shavar Johnson was a victim. Remember the text message that I talked about earlier? They were found in Webb's phone, not in Johnson's phone. This means, only Webb had knowledge of that text message and her intentions thereof. 

Shavar is going to urgently need a good legal defense. If any of you are interested in donating to help get Shavar a good Attorney, please send me a message.

WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER DATE OR MARRY A CONFORMIST, IF YOU LOVE FREEDOM

If  you are a critical thinker and do not like what is going on in today's society or the world, you should not date or marry a CONFORMIST. Most conformists always go along with society and what is asked of them by the government. And this is a problem, and it will ultimately create problems for you. They will most likely sell you out, give you up, and stifle your freedom, because they do not understand what freedom is. And they do not know how to take a big hit in life. In other words, they do not know how to deal with inconvenience or bad times. Conformists are weak -- they truly are.  If you date them or marry them, you are putting your health, wealth, mental state and freedom in jeopardy. These are the people who are unknowingly helping the New World Order come to light. Because they are just going with the flow of things, even if those things are wrong. Many of them are middle class, who have a lot to lose financially, so they are not going to resist at all. They are conformists, remember? So, if you are a rebellious person, a freedom-loving person, then you should stay away from dating a conformist-minded person -- period.

THE "REAL I.D. CARD": ONE STEP CLOSER TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY MARK OF THE BEAST CHIP

The Real I.D. is a federal invasion of our privacy and the over-riding of the sovereignty and powers of the states. And secretly, the Real I.D. makes private citizens full-blown federal citizens instead of state citizens. There will no longer be dual citizenship between the two. States at this point have almost no power or say over anything. Everything, and all power, is being gobbled up and centralized by the federal government. What the federal government is doing and has been doing is taking away social power (power of the people), and taking away states power (power of the states) and converting all of it into federal power, causing everyone to bow down and depend on the federal government for everything. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. This was talked about in Albert J. Knock's book "Our Enemy The State". I suggest that you all read that book.

Back to the Real I.D. What governments tend to do, but particularly, the federal government, is create all sorts of inconveniences for people, or threaten them with economic consequences so that people have no choice but to submit to the government's will. For example, if you do not get the Real I.D. card, you won't be able to use certain federal buildings or board a plan. The only exception to the rule regarding boarding a plane, domestically, is that you can alternatively use a U.S. Passport. But eventually that alternative will taken away. The second example of making things inconvenient to bend people to the government's will is telling people that if they do not do a federal 1040 Tax Form, they will be eligible for  legitimate employment. See, it's these things is why I know that most people will take the Mark of the Beast. People want to not be inconvenienced. They want to be able to make money, board a plane, buy a house, and put food in their bellies -- case closed.

The crazy thing about all this, if the federal government and federal buildings are public buildings (funded by our tax dollars), how then can the federal government ban the general public from using these buildings? But Americans don't take time to think about these things.

Anatomy Of The State

This photo was taken from one of my books entitled "Anatomy Of The State" -- by Murray Rothbard. What he describes in this chapter of his book (What The State Fears) is that the State uses maximum propaganda to make people believe that when they fight in a war initiated by the State, they are defending themselves, when, in fact, they are defending the State and the State's interests. He (Murray) also notes that the State fears an uprising or revolt by its subjects or fear being conquered by another Nation State. In my opinion, the American government has nothing to fear, because many of its subjects are deeply brainwashed by propaganda and not fight back. Nor do they study to gain the intellect necessary to overcome their government's brainwashing. Yes, it's very unfortunate, indeed.

Shelby High School Student Is Not The Only One To Blame

 Shelby High School

 The Shelby High School student, in Shelby, Ohio, who was arrested last week, I know him personally. The problem with his situation is that he was only responding to threats and rumors circulating around the school he attends. There were rumors that a student was gong to come and shoot up the school. So the student who was arrested for making counter threats was only trying to scare off the person who had made the first threats. So the student took to social media to make counter threats and was arrested for it. But why didn't the student who made the first threats get prosecuted? Why didn't the students who were spreading the rumors get in trouble? This is still a form of “inducing panic” pursuant to ORC 2917.31, because the original threats and rumors took place in a public place – school, and caused panic and a reaction from the student who was arrested.

Now, I'm not going to completely excuse anyone's bad decisions, but I have to look at things from a logical and honest perspective. Here are some facts: The student who made the counter threats did not necessarily have access to guns. He was not in a public place when he made the counter threats, and no evacuations had to be performed as a result. People, especially teenagers, say dumb things on social media all the time. The student who made the counter threats didn't want to go to school the next day: he said that he feared for his life. He didn't know he was breaking the law by making counter threats. In fact, most teenagers do not know the law, and no one really educates them about the law. Even more troubling, many adults do know the law, and most of them break the law all the time without even knowing it, because there are way too many laws on the law book. Even a cop told me one time, “There are so many laws; we are unable to enforce them all.” So there has to be a level of sympathy and accountability for certain people and situations as they pertain to the law.

But this is just a lesson for that young man, but he does not need to be an example. There is way too much of that in America. No more, I say.

We are neither free nor brave

Yeah, but Americans won't do anything about it. Because they never fight back!

I do not have blood on my hand: Here's why

1. I do not take the liberty to vote for people running for public offices, especially the presidential seat. If these people send troops overseas to kill innocent people, my hands won't have any blood on them, because I didn't vote. If these people order cops to beat up on people and lock people up for asserting their constitutional and human rights, my mind and hands will be clear of that as well. But if I help put these people in office, and they do something crazy, I won't be able to sleep at night.
2. And if I didn't put these people in office, then they shouldn't be able to flex their power over me. I didn't asked to be ruled by them, nor have I asked them to do anything for me. There is no social contract in place that I remember signing that authorized them to do so.

Human evolution is Bullsh*t

 "Evolution say people came from monkeys and the question is 'why is there still monkeys?' You dumb mothe*fu*ker you." --Katt Williams


I love Katt Williams. But I digress. If we do, in fact, evolve, then many of us should have gotten much smarter and wiser over time, but we haven't. Have racism, sexism, classicism, wars, murder and poverty been done away with by human beings who are evolving and getting smarter? Nope! Human beings are going in reverse -- devolving. Everything else is getting smarter, except human beings. Water is getting smarter (Smart Water). Cell phones are getting smarter (Smart Phones). Watches are getting smarter (Smart Watches). TVs are getting smarter (Smart TVs). Everything else is getting smarter, leaving us behind. Those things I just named, they do what we can't do or too lazy to do. Evolution is ,in fact, true for technology, but not true for biology, as far as I can see. Our style of clothes may change. Our hairstyle may change, and our bodies may get fatter or skinnier because of the food we ingest, but we are not evolving.


I've been on this earth for 38 years, and I haven't seen humans evolve into anything different. I've seen human behavior get worse as technology evolve, but that's it. Evolution as far as humans are concerned is utter BS!!!

The Corrupt Child Support Industial Complex (Revisited)

This is child support in a nutshell

(pseudo alimony).

There are dozens of stories of people killing over child support – people who felt they were victimized by the Child-Support Program. Instead of people scratching their heads and admitting that something is wrong with the system, they want to defend the system by writing people off as being “crazy” or “psycho”, people who were driven mad and went off to kill their ex-wives, ex-husbands or kids. No one wants to see the system as the motivating factor behind the killings or dysfunction. I say look at the laws enforced by Child Support Enforcement Agencies and the Courts. Therefrom, we can get a clearer picture as to why child-support casualties transpire. Shamefully, the best people can do is say, "Those people are 'psycho' or 'crazy'." This is what people say anytime a killing strikes. No intellectual thoughts or investigations as to why people resort to murder. Therefore, nothing ever changes, and if something does change, it resulted from a slow and painful process. Why? Because many people in the majority do not read or do independent research and thus find themselves indoctrinated by government propaganda instead.
 
In the mix of all this child-support corruption and chicanery, the “states” are getting wages, funds and/or incentive money behind collecting and enforcing child support – plus a big healthy annual bonus to top it off. This incentive money is given to them by the federal government under, and pursuant to, Title IV-D of the Social Security Act and/or Title 42 U.S.C 658. Said incentives are the fire-starters of the corruption you see, today, in family courts. Hence, it is safe to say, from the evidence presented here, that children in the U.S. are being used as pawns and money-making machines by the State and many low-life custodial parents.
   
Lastly, just take a serious look at the chaos, murder and dysfunction the Child-Support Program produces (backed up by real headlines that I've acquired throughout the course of my research on the Child-Support Program), “Man ordered to pay child support for child that’s not his,” “Gunman kills 4 who collected child support payments,” “Man angry over child support kills mother of his children” and “Father goes to jail after over-paying child support”. As Neely Fuller Jr. once stated, "Any system that produces injustice is an unjust system."The Child-Support Program has produced egregious injustices. Most of the injustices on which I expounded in the aforesaid sentence cultivates the following: extortion, irresponsibility, promiscuity in young women, single-parent homes, chaos and murder. Since the State intentionally passes nonsense laws that ultimately create discord among human beings, whatever crimes are committed as a result of those laws, it is therefore right and/or correct to charge the State with those crimes.
 
If any of you are looking to beat the Child-Support System at its own game, follow this link: http://www.deltabravo.net/cms/plugins/content/content.php?content.162

Clothes don't make the man, the man makes the man: An article on racist dress codes

Back in 2011, I wrote an article in the Mansfield News Journal about several bars and clubs implementing, what many perceive to be, racist dress codes. One bar, in particular, was headed by a well-known racist. There were talks of this particular owner for years. There were rumors of him removing Hennessy from his inventory because he knew that more black people than white people drink Hennessy. There was another incident (10 months ago) involving the same owner. The issue, of course, was about him  closing down his establishment early because he had an influx of mostly black people entering his bar. Yet when I wrote an article exposing this guy's racist dress codes and his racist behavior in general, many of his minions and/or supporters verbally attacked me in the comment section of my article. They used all kinds of shaming tactics, etc. They called me a reverse racist; though there is no such thing as a reverse racist. A racist is a racist. They accursed me of playing the race card. which is nothing more than a shaming tactic to get me to stop talking about the race issue. Nevertheless, I maintained my position, and, in fact, I wrote another article  responding to the criticism and shaming tactics of those who wanted me to shut up and not tell the truth.

Here is the article:
                                                      

"From the outset, I want to make it very clear that I am against any form of discrimination. I don't care who it is (black or white). If any person uses sexist, racist and discriminatory implements, I will write about it. And one shall feel guilty if it sounds like I'm talking about him or her. Furthermore, using shaming language or tactics to get me to stop talking about race issue, gender issues and other issues that confront the human race will not deter my efforts or ability to address the forgoing issues. It will only amplify my position. 

Using shaming language or tactics, such as calling a person racist or sexist for addressing race issues and gender issues, will only manifest guilt complex of the party using the shaming language. The guilty party, however, will inevitably resort to using immature language and shaming tactics as they ooze with anger instead of logic. They, of course, do this behind a computer screen -- mind you. It's to be expected. Oh, yes. 

Moreover, to respond to the unenlightened commentators of my last letter, I do not subscribe to anyone playing the race card. I will expose anyone who is doing so. In addition, I will not apologize for telling the truth, nor will I condone discriminatory dress codes or discrimination, period. I do, however, agree that people should not have their pants sagging, showing their underwear. But white T's? Come on. That dress code is over the top for any club or bar that's not highly exquisite. Some establishments utilize stupid because they think that certain clothes are affiliated with gangsters and thugs. That's funny. And sometimes they utilize dress codes as an apparatus to detour certain people. So many people do this out of ignorance. Clothes don't cause drama; people cause drama through stupidity."

"Note: Gangsters wear suits and dressy clothes, too. Some of the biggest gangsters and pimps are in the U.S. government. You follow? The clothes don't make the man, you see? The man makes the man."

Now, let me ask the reader of this article some honest and important questions. If I say I don't want people who wear hunter's camouflage clothes to enter my establishment. Which people am I targeting? More than likely, I am targeting white males who are deemed as Hillbillies and rural white-males who love hunting. If I say I don't want women who wear red rubies on their foreheads to enter into my establishment. Which women am I referring to? More than likely, I am referring to Indian women. It is a well-known fact that difference races have difference cultures and/or traditions. And clothes, apparel, the way people dress, are usually associated with those cultures and/or traditions.

Thugs and gangsters, unfortunately, are a part of every race and are known to wear two-piece suits, urban clothes, tropical clothes, etc. You get the point. Gangsters and thugs dress universally. They don't dress a particular way. 

Dress codes in many clubs, bars, etc., are not meant to keep out thugs and gangsters. They are meant to restrict the culture of, and detour, certain races of people. Therefore, many dress codes, in essence, have a racist intent behind them. But racist personalities try to hide this fact. Racists don't like to be called racist. In fact,  many of them do not see themselves as racists. If we are going to deal with the race problem, we are going to have to start being honest. Now is a good time to start.

Stop lying on Tupac and his use of the words "Thug" and "Thug Life"

People and the media are still lying on Tupac and his use of the words "Thug" and "Thug Life". They lied on Tupac when he was alive and they're still lying on the man 19-years later after his death. That's the problem with people in Western-World countries, especially in America; they have no qualms or regrets when they lie on people or when they give out false information on events, things and people. Now, it's time to set the record straight, with this article.

When Tupac used the phrase "Thug Life", he was not talking about a life of robbing people, murdering people and raping people. The phrase "Thug Life", as defined by Tupac, means "The-Hate-U-Give Little-Infants-Fucks-Everyone". Meaning, when you feed a child hate, that's what that child will grow up to be, like the people we see in the ghettos across United States. Letting a child grow up in poverty, and an atmosphere of hate and racism, this is what creates a thug. The online Urban Dictionary noted Tupac's definition of a thug. It quoted Tupac as stating, "A thug is someone who is going through struggles, has gone through struggles, and continues to live day by day with nothing for them. That person is a thug. and the life they are living is the thug life. A thug is NOT a gangster." Now, on to the word "nigga". The word "nigga", as defined by Tupac, means "Never-Ignorant-Getting-Goals-Accomplished". The aforementioned is a testament of Tupac's brilliance. But the media wanted to portray -- and still portrays -- him as a boogeyman. No surprise!

Tupac was a one-of-a-kind rapper, a revolutionary rapper, not so much a gangster rapper. His lyrics only got a little harsher when he went to prison behind trumped up charges of sexual assault. And Tupac, I believe, was killed by agents of the government, the same government that tried to make Tupac's death appear as if it were street related. And who wouldn't believe this, given Tupac's background?  In both cases in which Tupac was shot (in 1994 and 1996), neither a suspect nor a gun was ever found. Hmm.

Tupac was a great poet and visionary whose life was cut short. I don't remember gangsters composing songs like "Dear Mama", "Brenda's Got A Baby", "Keep Ya Head Up" and "The Good Die Young". These songs were composed and recorded by the one and only, Tupac Shakur, a man of extraordinary compassion and vision. If there are any gangsters or thugs, as defined by the "Webster's  Dictionary", those thugs and gangsters are sitting in the White House, in the Mayor's office, in the Capital Building, and in the Police Departments across the nation. These people don't give a damn about us or our children. They have robbed, lied and murdered people. But when private citizens do these things, they are labeled criminals and thugs. How about that? That doesn't seem very fair, does it?

Police Arrested Him For Minor Traffic Violation, Then Faked His Suicide, But He SURVIVED

Police in St. Louis recently arrested a man on a minor traffic violation, and the blocked paramedics who said he needed to be taken to the hospital.

Paramedics from Northeast Fire Protection District say that they went to the Pine Lawn jail in September on a call to check on an inmate who had abdominal pain and bleeding. He explained that he needed to go to the emergency room, but police officers and deputies working in the jail refused to listen to him.

The paramedic corroborates the man’s report, saying that one police officer had already changed into his off duty clothes to prepare to board the ambulance with him, but the officer’s supervisor canceled the release of the inmate.

It is unclear why Bernard Scott, 44, was even being held in lieu of $360 bail for traffic cases. Locking the man up for such petty crimes seems unreasonable to most. But forcing him to remain behind bars when he was in need of medical attention is without question criminal on the part of police.
The paramedic more or less begged the officers to allow him to take Scott with him.
“PD again advised by EMS that pt should be transferred to ED for further medical attention,” he said in his report.

The police answer was still a definitive “no”, without any explanation as to why.

The police still have not given an answer as to why they refused to allow Scott much needed medical treatment.Only 14 minutes after the final denial, the jail had to call another ambulance, as Scott was unconscious with stiff muscles. He was agitated, aggressive from the pain he was in, and in a posture that medical experts claim is indicative of brain damage, according to the EMT report.
Police say they found Scott hanging by his neck from a shoelace that was tied to his cell door. The story is reminding many of the Texas arrest of Sandra Bland, this summer. But in the case of Scott, there are more answers, because he survived.

(Article by M. David)

No Vaseline

 The Democrats hit you in your left jaw, and the Republicans

hit you in your right jaw. It's a case of being screwed with no Vaseline.

The Democrats and Republicans are one in the same. If you challenge the American system itself, watch the Democrats and Republicans unite against you. They are for the same system and same things. They make you believe they are against each other, but they are not. It's a shell game. Their job is to make you believe you have a choice! But you don't have a choice . You have the right to vote but not the right to choose. The electoral college does all the choosing. Look at the Al Gore and Bush situation back in 2000. The popular vote meant nothing. 

With other political elements that govern our lives, such as so-called democracy -- we still don't have a say in the matter.

The Democrats and Republicans have been draining you dry, rocking your cradle, and tearing your families down, and doing it to you with no Vaseline. Oh, yes! That's what they've been doing to you. Look the gas prices. Look at the huge taxes coming out of your paychecks to fund wars and other unjust activities. Look at the inflation of your $ money! And look at yourselves. Look at what they've put you through, on a daily basis. It's said, I tell you. The system, the Democrats and Republicans are playing with your heads, and they are not your friends. They are oppo-sames. Enough said!

America, you are wrong

The United States is wrong on almost every level. Although I don't support homosexuality, I believe homosexuals have a right to live in peace. At the same time, this country is wrong for trying to condition heterosexual children, on a conscious and subconscious level, to either be homosexuals or to promote it. If someone wants to be homosexual, let it be their choice, but don't try to force it on people, because that is wrong, unjust and/or incorrect.

Nowadays, we have certain segments of homosexuals who want gay supremacy. Just like certain women groups, they want female supremacy. And we have certain Black American organizations that are the same way. And I've noticed, groups that have been subjected to government oppression are now seeking to have more than they deserve. No race, gender or nation should get more than the other. Take your fair share, and keep it moving.

Again, the United States need to stop promoting stuff, and give people a choice. That is, stop trying to shove things down people's throats.

What's next? It's OK to be a pedophile. Like I told people some years back, I wouldn't be surprised if America started promoting pedophilia. Why? Because this is the crap America does, and it uses shaming tactics to get everyone to comply. This is called Machiavellian politics – the art of manipulation.

Follow this link for information on the U.S. government promoting homosexuality in schools: http://www.westernjournalism.com/get-em-theyre-young-promoting-homosexuality-public-schools/

Don't believe the hype -- Everyone can't be equal or financially successful

This is the truth of the matter!!!

There are a lot of things I hate about modern-day America. One such thing is the belief that everybody can be financially successful. This is utter nonsense. Let me explain. We live in a capitalist society (which is centered around competition and the accumulation of wealth), and in this capitalist society, there are different classes of people. What does this mean? It means, in order for someone to become rich, someone else has to become less rich, less wealthy or poor. The rich man's wealth has to come from someone. Unfortunately, his wealth comes from people like you and me -- middle class and poor people. It's an economic-pyramid scheme. This very thing was explained in the movie "In Time".

Never in American history -- in fact world history -- has there been equality among human beings, especially financially. So this whole notion that everyone can go to college and make it to the top is utter bullshit. Another thing, there are global elitists that constantly rig or manipulate the current system to ensure that they and their descends stay on top. These people are called one percenters (1%s.). And trust me; you are not going to get to where they are, nor are you going to transcend them. If you think it is possible, go for it. But I bet you -- you won't make it out first gear.

Best quotes from the movie "In Time" regarding my post on wealth:

Henry Hamilton: "For a few to be immortal, many must die."

Will Salas: "What in the hell is that suppose to mean?"

Henry Hamilton: "You really don't know, do you? Everyone can't live forever. Where would we put them? Why do you think there are time zones? Why do you think taxes and prices go up the same day in the ghetto? The cost of living keeps rising to make sure people keep dying. How else could there be men with a million years while most live day to day? But the truth is... there's more than enough. No one has to die before their time."

The decline of two-parent homes have decimated this country

This produces....

.... This

If black people want to know what happened to their family structure and why they are worse off today than in the 1940s, ’50s and early ’60s, they can trace most of their woes directly to the federal government’s infiltration of the civil rights movement.

People like Gloria Steinem (a so-called feminist and former instrument of the CIA), Lyndon B. Johnson, Sen. Russell Long, Jimmy Carter and late Bill Clinton all had a hand in the destruction of the nuclear family, especially the black family. These people created the welfare state, the child support program and promoted single-mother homes. They also crafted diabolical welfare policies that set ablaze self-defeat. These people and their devilish polices started to manifest during and after the civil rights movement. Most of them were, and some still are, members of the Democratic Party, the party black people keep voting for. 

Black matriarchy/single-mother homes, black-on-black crime, chaos, intense poverty and illegitimate children increased as result of what was mentioned in the above paragraph. Now these same policies and programs — including radical feminism — are rapidly destroying white families as well, especially the lower and middle-class white families. No surprise.

Ever since the 1970s (the rise of the anti-two parent home), an influx of young men from single-mother homes (mostly black men) started to fill the prisons. This proves that fatherless homes have a profound and detrimental effect on young boys’ psyches. And the government knows this, by the way. Furthermore, in single-mother homes, young boys are not taught how to build and how to be an alpha male in an alpha world. Now, we can clearly see why so many black men function as they do in society.

Just look at the statistics with regards to black-on-black crime, single-mother homes, illegitimacy etc. You will find these woes drastically increased after the civil rights and feminist movements. Before these movements, only 9 percent of black families with children were headed by a single parent. It is obvious the solution to most of these problems is the two-parent home.

AUTHOR'S NOTE: This article was originally published in the Mansfield News Journal on July 19, 2014. The purpose of this article is to inform the human race about the consequences of producing and raising children without having the feminine and masculine aspects present. When one of these aspects are missing from a child’s life, what is left is an un-stabled child -- harsh but true.  It is very important that parents understand this. 


What the U.S. Government is trying to create is a matriarchy in all communities. Thus-far, looking at the black community, matriarchy has failed. This is why there is so much dysfunction in the black community, boys and girls being raised without the masculine aspect. And this will happen to other communities or races of people if they allow the government to root a matriarchy in their communities. Ghettos and dysfunction will follow. To prevent this, women must not be subsidized by the government to be single mothers or to be rewarded for producing multiple children they cannot financially support. Only through welfare (handouts) can the government produce or achieve such diabolical results.  

If you take our guns, take the government's guns, too

It's  our natural and constitutional rights to bear arms

[Revised Version]

Every time there is a mass shooting, here comes a group of liberals and people who don't know any better saying, "Take the guns." "We need more gun control." It's the guns." It's funny how these gun issues came up during Bill Clinton's presidency. Now, they're coming up again during Barack Obama's presidency. How strange, both men are affiliated with the same political party (the Democratic party). This is the same political party that created the welfare state and harsh child support laws. This is the same political party that allows people to leech off of other people, and this is the same political party responsible for the epidemic of fatherless homes. No surprise there. But to be fair, the Republicans are no better. Both of them -- Democrats and Republicans -- are a part of the same oppressive system.

Now, let me tell all of you how stupid these liberals and anti-gun people sound -- when it comes to guns and mass murder. When police officers, for example, shoot an innocent old lady, a young boy, or a lawful protester, do any of you ever hear the liberals or anti-gun people say, "Take the guns from the police; they just shot innocent people"? Or, when U.S. soldiers were ordered to kill masses of innocent people who had nothing to do with 911th, did any of you ever hear the liberals come out and say, "Take the U.S. soldier's guns; they just killed a bunch of innocent people"? Or, when the U.S. government dropped two atom bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima (killing thousands of people, mainly civilians), did any of you ever hear the liberals come out and say, "Don't let the U.S. government build anymore bombs, because it just killed thousands of people in Japan"? No, you never heard the liberals or anyone else come out and say those things. You only hear this anti-gun rhetoric when a private citizen commits mass murder -- never when the government does it.

It appears, the State (or government) is allowed to commit mass murder (or have a monopoly on violence) and nothing is ever said about taking the governments guns, nor is anything said about regulating the government's guns. Yet, when one our own (a private citizen) commits the same acts, we want to take or regulate the guns of private citizens. And that is an unrealistic solution! My solution is this; if we're going take away guns, then the State should not be allowed to have guns, either. That way, we are all safe -- or would we? 

See, what is happening is the State and ignorant people are trying to convert another social power (the right to bear arms) into State power. Before long, the State will have all the power, and the citizens won't have any power. And if people keep allowing the State to have a monopoly on everything, one day they are going to wake up with military boots on their faces.

Lastly, I don't appreciate other citizens asking or using the State or its collective power to try to take away my guns, other people’s guns, or anything else we have in our possession. Furthermore, what these people are doing is using and asking the State to take guns so they can feel safe. What these people don't understand is that the State is not going to protect them by taking away the guns. What the State is going to do is oppress, manipulate and exploit people even more so, because people won't have guns to protect themselves. The aforesaid is the end result.This is why people are fighting to protect the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 

The guns are not going anywhere, unless the government is willing to give up its guns, too. 

America, the truth shall set you free

A Message To The Voting Cattle!

The Ancient Egyptian Ankh -- decoded

Crux Ansata

The ancient Egyptian ankh (crux ansata) is the oldest cross in the world. It is known as the "key to eternal life." This is where the Latin cross (Christian cross) comes from. Furthermore, the Egyptian ankh is a representation of male and female sexual unity and/or generative principle. The top part of the ankh represents the female's vagina or womb; the middle and bottom part of the ankh represents the male's phallus and testicles. This is why the ankh represents ever-lasting life. Life is continued not only through the spiritual world, but it also carried on through our children. They carry on our legacy, DNA, etc. Simply put, the ankh is the oldest and most powerful spiritual symbol in the world.