"Prosecutor said woman set up deadly stabbing with boyfriend", but is it entirely true

Picture of Shavar Johnson 

On 12\11\2024, Shavar Johnson, 23, and his girlfriend, Courtney Webb, 21, were arrested, in Columbus, Ohio, for the stabbing death of  22-year-old Amareyon Daniels. 

While prosecutors stated the obvious, that the tabbing death of Amareyon was entirely staged, however, they never considered that the co-defendant, Shavar Johnson, might have been set up as well, unknowingly used, deceived into believing that his girlfriend was being raped and robbed, which resulted in the stabbing death of  Mr. Daniels. According to some news sources, detectives acquired a warrant to search Webb's phone, whereupon they discovered text messages that stated:

"I'm going to hell after tonight because I don't let that mother****r get away after this. I'm about to set this mother****r up for real" 

The aforesaid text was sent to an unknown number hours before the stabbing took place. Detectives said that Webb accused Daniels of stealing weed and money from her. Interestingly enough, before this text message was released to the public, my aunt, and other people, believe that Webb screamed rape, prompting an urgency from Johnson to run to the passenger-side of the vehicle (where Daniels was sitting) and attacked Daniels. It is believed by many people, including me, both Johnson and Daniels were victims of a secret, selfish and twisted agenda. And as a result, one young man is deceased and the other is incarcerated. I sincerely believe that all of the aforesaid are what happened based on all of the articles that I've read as well as other reliable sources. So, two questions remain: Why isn't the spotlight completely on Webb? And whatever happened to the gun that was recovered on the scene, as revealed in the first few articles that covered this story? It's like the gun totally disappeared. No updates on fingerprints and to whom the gun belonged. 

We've all watched crime shows, like that of ID Channel, etc. And we've seen particularly men get used, manipulated or deceived into killing other men for women who had ill-intentions. This type of thing happens more often than not. Unfortunately, this appears to be the same deception of which Shavar Johnson was a victim. Remember the text message that I talked about earlier? They were found in Webb's phone, not in Johnson's phone. This means, only Webb had knowledge of that text message and her intentions thereof. 

Shavar is going to urgently need a good legal defense. If any of you are interested in donating to help get Shavar a good Attorney, please send me a message.

Shelby High School Student Is Not The Only One To Blame

 Shelby High School

 The Shelby High School student, in Shelby, Ohio, who was arrested last week, I know him personally. The problem with his situation is that he was only responding to threats and rumors circulating around the school he attends. There were rumors that a student was gong to come and shoot up the school. So the student who was arrested for making counter threats was only trying to scare off the person who had made the first threats. So the student took to social media to make counter threats and was arrested for it. But why didn't the student who made the first threats get prosecuted? Why didn't the students who were spreading the rumors get in trouble? This is still a form of “inducing panic” pursuant to ORC 2917.31, because the original threats and rumors took place in a public place – school, and caused panic and a reaction from the student who was arrested.

Now, I'm not going to completely excuse anyone's bad decisions, but I have to look at things from a logical and honest perspective. Here are some facts: The student who made the counter threats did not necessarily have access to guns. He was not in a public place when he made the counter threats, and no evacuations had to be performed as a result. People, especially teenagers, say dumb things on social media all the time. The student who made the counter threats didn't want to go to school the next day: he said that he feared for his life. He didn't know he was breaking the law by making counter threats. In fact, most teenagers do not know the law, and no one really educates them about the law. Even more troubling, many adults do know the law, and most of them break the law all the time without even knowing it, because there are way too many laws on the law book. Even a cop told me one time, “There are so many laws; we are unable to enforce them all.” So there has to be a level of sympathy and accountability for certain people and situations as they pertain to the law.

But this is just a lesson for that young man, but he does not need to be an example. There is way too much of that in America. No more, I say.

The Corrupt Child Support Industial Complex (Revisited)

This is child support in a nutshell

(pseudo alimony).

There are dozens of stories of people killing over child support – people who felt they were victimized by the Child-Support Program. Instead of people scratching their heads and admitting that something is wrong with the system, they want to defend the system by writing people off as being “crazy” or “psycho”, people who were driven mad and went off to kill their ex-wives, ex-husbands or kids. No one wants to see the system as the motivating factor behind the killings or dysfunction. I say look at the laws enforced by Child Support Enforcement Agencies and the Courts. Therefrom, we can get a clearer picture as to why child-support casualties transpire. Shamefully, the best people can do is say, "Those people are 'psycho' or 'crazy'." This is what people say anytime a killing strikes. No intellectual thoughts or investigations as to why people resort to murder. Therefore, nothing ever changes, and if something does change, it resulted from a slow and painful process. Why? Because many people in the majority do not read or do independent research and thus find themselves indoctrinated by government propaganda instead.
 
In the mix of all this child-support corruption and chicanery, the “states” are getting wages, funds and/or incentive money behind collecting and enforcing child support – plus a big healthy annual bonus to top it off. This incentive money is given to them by the federal government under, and pursuant to, Title IV-D of the Social Security Act and/or Title 42 U.S.C 658. Said incentives are the fire-starters of the corruption you see, today, in family courts. Hence, it is safe to say, from the evidence presented here, that children in the U.S. are being used as pawns and money-making machines by the State and many low-life custodial parents.
   
Lastly, just take a serious look at the chaos, murder and dysfunction the Child-Support Program produces (backed up by real headlines that I've acquired throughout the course of my research on the Child-Support Program), “Man ordered to pay child support for child that’s not his,” “Gunman kills 4 who collected child support payments,” “Man angry over child support kills mother of his children” and “Father goes to jail after over-paying child support”. As Neely Fuller Jr. once stated, "Any system that produces injustice is an unjust system."The Child-Support Program has produced egregious injustices. Most of the injustices on which I expounded in the aforesaid sentence cultivates the following: extortion, irresponsibility, promiscuity in young women, single-parent homes, chaos and murder. Since the State intentionally passes nonsense laws that ultimately create discord among human beings, whatever crimes are committed as a result of those laws, it is therefore right and/or correct to charge the State with those crimes.
 
If any of you are looking to beat the Child-Support System at its own game, follow this link: http://www.deltabravo.net/cms/plugins/content/content.php?content.162

Police Arrested Him For Minor Traffic Violation, Then Faked His Suicide, But He SURVIVED

Police in St. Louis recently arrested a man on a minor traffic violation, and the blocked paramedics who said he needed to be taken to the hospital.

Paramedics from Northeast Fire Protection District say that they went to the Pine Lawn jail in September on a call to check on an inmate who had abdominal pain and bleeding. He explained that he needed to go to the emergency room, but police officers and deputies working in the jail refused to listen to him.

The paramedic corroborates the man’s report, saying that one police officer had already changed into his off duty clothes to prepare to board the ambulance with him, but the officer’s supervisor canceled the release of the inmate.

It is unclear why Bernard Scott, 44, was even being held in lieu of $360 bail for traffic cases. Locking the man up for such petty crimes seems unreasonable to most. But forcing him to remain behind bars when he was in need of medical attention is without question criminal on the part of police.
The paramedic more or less begged the officers to allow him to take Scott with him.
“PD again advised by EMS that pt should be transferred to ED for further medical attention,” he said in his report.

The police answer was still a definitive “no”, without any explanation as to why.

The police still have not given an answer as to why they refused to allow Scott much needed medical treatment.Only 14 minutes after the final denial, the jail had to call another ambulance, as Scott was unconscious with stiff muscles. He was agitated, aggressive from the pain he was in, and in a posture that medical experts claim is indicative of brain damage, according to the EMT report.
Police say they found Scott hanging by his neck from a shoelace that was tied to his cell door. The story is reminding many of the Texas arrest of Sandra Bland, this summer. But in the case of Scott, there are more answers, because he survived.

(Article by M. David)

America, you are wrong

The United States is wrong on almost every level. Although I don't support homosexuality, I believe homosexuals have a right to live in peace. At the same time, this country is wrong for trying to condition heterosexual children, on a conscious and subconscious level, to either be homosexuals or to promote it. If someone wants to be homosexual, let it be their choice, but don't try to force it on people, because that is wrong, unjust and/or incorrect.

Nowadays, we have certain segments of homosexuals who want gay supremacy. Just like certain women groups, they want female supremacy. And we have certain Black American organizations that are the same way. And I've noticed, groups that have been subjected to government oppression are now seeking to have more than they deserve. No race, gender or nation should get more than the other. Take your fair share, and keep it moving.

Again, the United States need to stop promoting stuff, and give people a choice. That is, stop trying to shove things down people's throats.

What's next? It's OK to be a pedophile. Like I told people some years back, I wouldn't be surprised if America started promoting pedophilia. Why? Because this is the crap America does, and it uses shaming tactics to get everyone to comply. This is called Machiavellian politics – the art of manipulation.

Follow this link for information on the U.S. government promoting homosexuality in schools: http://www.westernjournalism.com/get-em-theyre-young-promoting-homosexuality-public-schools/

Your children are owned by the State

It's unsafe for people to have children in the United States. This is especially true for men. Every child born in the United States run a 95% chance of getting exploited by the United States government. With Social Services, Children Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement, Family Law Courts, Welfare, Birth Certificates, and Social Security Numbers, children are fundamentally "wards of the State". 

Parents may have biological relations with their children, and they may be parents biologically, but again, their children are "wards of the State". Their children belong to the government. If this is not true, why does the government have the ability or power to take people's children away? Why does the government have the ability or power to tell men how much they are going to pay for their children in a child support case? Why does the government have the ability or power to tell parents that they can't physically discipline their children? Because, the government owns the children. Once a mother or father signs a Birth Certificate and their children are given a Social Security Number (mark of the BEAST), their children are no longer theirs -- legally. 

For men, their children can be used to plunder them of money in a child support case. This generates revenue for the State (the Government -- Uncle Sam). Almost parallel to the father, children can be used against the mother in a so-called "child endangering case", a means by which the State can justify violating the mother's rights. 

These revelations or issues are profoundly unsettling. Do you want to know why? Because parents in the United States allow these issues to persist. In addition, parents spend too much time watching TV, watching sports, working, socializing, getting incarcerated, and letting the schools raise their children. Many parents in the United States have fundamentally given up their "best interest of the child", and they have let the State have the "best interest of the child". But the State never has the "best interest of the child", because the State doesn't have emotions or feelings. The State is an artificial person -- a legal fiction that serves its own interests. That's all it does.

For further reading, go to these sites:

Do You Own Your Children

http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/do-you-own-your-children/

Fighting For His Country (Child Support Robbery)

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=6283610

Social Security: Mark of the Beast

http://famguardian.org/Publications/SocialSecurity/TOC.htm

Please take a moment and make a small donation to my "FIGHT BACK!" blog-site. The PayPal donation button is on the sidebar of the site. Thanks!

Eve, stop being tricked and used by the Serpent (the government)

This is what's happening to families! 

Women should do their best to keep the biological father in the home, if he's a good man. They should not let the Serpent (the government) tempt them or trick them into leaving or disposing of the father in favor of welfare, child support, public housing, or whatever. The Serpent is always trying to trick or use Eve -- the woman. But it never uses or tricks Adam -- the man. The Serpent only goes after Eve. That's why women should always be leery of the Serpent (the government). If women are going to be "strong and independent", they  need to be strong and independent against the Serpent. Their husbands are the only ones that have their best interest, not the Serpent. Their children need their father. And the father needs to be in the same house, under the same roof.  This is essential for children's economic, social, and psychological well-being. Without the father, we will see more disrespectful, antisocial, and ungrateful children at an alarming rate. Studies have confirmed this.

The Serpent and its devilish welfare polices, corrupt family law courts, child-support-slave system, and no-fault divorce have done a good job at tempting and luring Eve in with these poisonous fruits -- fruits that are destroying her family. With over 72% of divorces initiated by women, the Serpent is being successful at using Eve (women). Because of this, fathers are being systematically removed from the home. Now, the Serpent (the government) is the new father, boyfriend, or husband. However, most of  the financial burden is still pushed onto the disenfranchised, biological father through the corrupt courts and through child support enforcement; no surprise there. 

Moreover, I utilized the Adam and Eve story (Genesis 3:1-24) from the Bible as a metaphor to illustrate what is happening to families in this country, and how certain women are being used to intentionally or unintentionally disintergrate their families. What has to happen now? Men and women -- especially men -- need to roll up their sleeves and tell the government to stay out of their business and out of certain aspects of domestic relations, especially concerning their children. 

Politics has never been about morality, and the government knows it

NOTE: The government is (by law) an artificial person; it acts as a single unit, making it a legal person or legal fiction. For example: Corporations like that of MacDonald's, Wal-Mart, and Burger King, each one of them, act as a single unit; therefore, they are recognized or considered to be legal persons, by law.

Legal persons, artificial persons, or legal fictions have no conscience, let along a moral conscience. As Supreme Court Justice Stevens said, and I quote verbatim: 

". . . corporations have no consciences, no beliefs, no feelings, no thoughts, no desires. Corporations help structure and facilitate the activities of human beings, to be sure, and their 'person-hood' often serves as a useful legal fiction. But they are not themselves members of “We the People” by whom and for whom our Constitution was established."

--Supreme Court Justice Stevens, January 2010 

The above quote also pertains to governments as well. Governments, like corporations, are groups of people acting as a single unit -- as one body. And their only function is, and always has been, to facilitate the actions or activities of human beings -- that's all. They do not act out of morality, because governments, as artificial persons, do not have a conscience. This proves that governments cannot have morals, nor can  governments care about people, or care about people's feelings. Again, they can only facilitate people's actions or activities. 

Now, all of you know that politics has nothing to do with morality. Y'all better listen to the words Niccolo Machiavelli; he stated the obvious. In his book "Machiavelli the Prince" he lays out the blueprint on how a government can utilize manipulation and deception to control its people and make them into willing servants. This is called Machiavellian politics -- the politics of deception or trickery. This is what the U.S. government, and other Illuminati-controlled governments, uses on its people. (Refer to the book "48 Laws of Power" written by Robert Greene)

So the next time a politician comes out with his sleeves rolled up like he's a working-class joe, standing up on a stage talking about morality, etc -- tell him he doesn't believe in morality because that's not what politics or politicians are about. It's about power, manipulation, and control -- nothing more, nothing less. This has been proven many times. Therefore, you can't believe anything that comes out of his mouth.

Lastly, people in government offices never speak the truth; they always speak with a forked tongue.

United States government attracts corrupt people

If anyone seeks to participate in the U.S. government knowing full-well of its corruption, I must hold to the belief that those individuals do not have good intentions and are willing to help perpetuate, re-define, and expand America's corruption. Therefore, in my experience, and I conclude, such persons seek certain positions of power within the U.S. government because they secretly or openly crave dominance or power over other people, which is their real reason for wanting to participate in such government. And since the U.S. government is corrupt, it is a government that is good at attracting bullies, psychopaths, racists, habitual liars, etc. Oh, yes! Hence, it is wise not to trust any man or woman who deliberately participate in the U.S. government and its agencies. 

Pursuant to Title 28 USC Section 3002, it states that the United States is a Federal Corporation, which means that so-called U.S. citizens are corporate franchises. In other words, they are subjects, not Citizens. The U.S. doesn't operate under Constitutional Law (law of the land) or Common Law; it operates under Maritime or Commercial Law (UCC -- Uniform Commercial Codes). Under this system, everything is about contracts; Did you make a contract? Do you have a Social Security Card, Driver's License, or any other government documents with your name spelled in all capital letters? If so, you've made a contract with the government, and you are now under its jurisdiction.

The gold fringe around the American-flag pole, which you will see in the president's oval office, in court rooms (whether they are civil or criminal), etc., indicate that these entities are operating under Maritime or Commercial Law. Most people operating within city, state and federal government are aware of these things. So the corruption is intentional. 

Therefore, I say again, I cannot trust anyone who is seeking to be a part of the United States government, knowing how corrupt is. Enough said!

Felony record/ conviction should not prohibit someone from employment

I believe everyone has the right to work in this country. I don't care if a person is a felon. A felony record has nothing to do with one's ability to work. If the felony conviction is not related to the job applied for, then there shouldn't be a problem giving that individual work. If, for example, an applicant with a record of shoplifting applies for work in a retail store, it will only be proper not to hire that person. The crime is related to the job. But to discriminate or ostracize across the board on the premise that one has a felony record is unjust. Furthermore, this unjust tactic, which is backed up by law, is used to shorten the workforce and to disenfranchise certain people because there are so few jobs left.

Moreover, since we in America have a tendency to judge each other -- although we all have dirt under our own rugs -- we think people should get a lifetime of punishment for making bad decisions  or mistakes. We say consciously and subconsciously, "Those dirty, lawless felons should have made better decisions." News flash -- we're human; we live and we learn. That's part of our spiritual growth in this plain of existence.

Dale C. Carson, an ex-FBI agent, ex-polieman, lawyer and co-author of Arrest-Proof Yourself, asked an intriguing question, "How easy is it to get a felony charge? Answer: Very easy." Dale Carson is correct, because records show that there are close to 5 million people in America with felony records. Unfortunately, most of those people will be back in prison because of a lack of  employment opportunities. This ripple effect will be a crime related to money issues. People have to eat. If America is not careful, delicate issues such as this one will burst into insurrection. People can only take being broke and poor for so long until the egg gets too hot and begins to hatch. And then, oh, oh!

Note: This article was taken from the Mansfield News Journal, written by me in 2012. 

The corrupt child support industrial complex

This is what child support is really about

The Child Support Industrial Complex is a corrupt system that the judges, magistrates, hearing officers, child support agencies, and others have an economic interest.

If anyone has been a Defendant in a child support case, they knew first hand that they had no chance when they stepped into the court room. They knew that 60 to 65 percent of their income would be gone. The higher the Child Support order the better the agents of the court, county, and state get paid. Because their salaries, pensions, and bonuses are linked directly or indirectly to child support enforcement and collections. Pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. Section 658, they get reimbursement/incentives in the amount of child support collected and enforced upon. That's the dirty secret, people! It's all about money, in the name of child support.

Children (and the fathers of those children) are being used as money-making apparatuses for the State. Exploitation, extortion, conspiracy, and deprivation are the names of the game. These terms are the proper terms to use when defining what it is the Family Law Courts do. This is why I urge families not to take their disagreements or problems to the court house. The Court will only exploit the misery of the situation for monetary gain. Also, the Court will encourage women to take huge financial blows at their ex-husbands/boyfriends as a parting gift.

Moreover, why is it when women contribute resources to their children, the Court calls it "child care"? But when men contribute resources to their children, the Court calls it a gift. The reason for this -- the Court/ government wants to make sure that men pay directly through the system so that the agents of the State can get paid. And sadly enough, many men are pushed into poverty because of this exploitation. But nobody cares as long they get paid. It is clear -- Courts are openly biased against fathers and so are the sexist, misandric laws that Courts implement. Men need to start  standing up to the child support system and start costing it money by filing class-action lawsuits. Better yet, the attitude that men need to take on is this,  "Give me liberty or give me death."

Vincent Hess Jr. defeat charges

On 8-26-09, Vicent Hess Jr. triumphed over the courrupt city of Manfield, Ohio! And it was a victory to remember. And an innocent man, whom I believed was innocent in the first place, has gotten all charges dropped against him. What a victory! This is just an example that all people are not guilty of the charges imposed on them.

NOTE: Now, read the article below, entitled No justice in Mansfield to get a full understanding of the article you just read.
Congragdulations, Vincent Hess Jr.

No justice in Mansfield

NOTE: This is happening in Mansfield, Ohio. This type of injustice happens very often in Mansfield, and somehow the judges and prosecutors seem to often get away with practicing great injustice against anyone they choose!
There is so much prejudice when it comes to administering real justice, proper justice, and untainted justice. Just recently, Vincent Hess, a military veteran, a family man, and a man who has never been in trouble with the law is about to be rail-roaded for crimes he didn't commit. The evidence proving Vincent Hess's innocence was submitted by the victim himself, a written statement by the victim saying that Vincent was not the perpetrator of the crimes committed. So why are the prosecutors ignoring this evidence? Because they hate to admit when they are wrong. The prosecutors on this case need to just get over it and admit that they are wrong. Be good sportsmen because all of you lose this one, Mr. and Mrs. Prosecutors.

Vincent was charged with 11 different accounts: burglary, kidnapping, and firearm specifications, just to name a few. I don't have room to name all of the charges. Unfortunately, Vincent is stuck with a public defender that is probably over-loaded with dozens of other cases. What can a public defender do for anyone who really needs help? Nothing, absolutely nothing! This so-called justice system makes me sick to my stomach. Please, lock up some real criminals! For example, crooked public officials!

Only a coward will try to lock up an innocent man. I wish the prosecutors who are prosecuting this case was in Vincent’s shoes and see how it feels to be "noosed" for something they didn't do. They would probably wet their pants. I'm pretty sure! Human beings are very biased when it comes to administering true justice. In fact, we hate true justice because it means that we will have to change our prejudice ways, and we don't want that! Before forming opinions about this case, please look into it first. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Cousin Kory is going to fight for you, Vincent.

Corruption and police brutality in Mansfield

Paul Rendal: Front Profile

Paul Rendal: Side Profile

On 1-3-08, Paul Rendal was charged with obstructing official business, resisting arrest, and intox. Apparently, Officer Kaufman (Badge No. 255) was responsible for charging Mr. Rendal with these trumped up charges and the injuries in which Mr.Rendal sustained.

Moreover, the police report has it that there was a complaint of a heated disturbance at Mr. Rendal's residence and that there were attempts made to contact the occupants to no avail. The report also stated: "Upon officer's arrival, they observed what appeared to be blood stains on the door jamb. MPD unit# 157 authorized officers to force entry in order to check on the occupants well-being." According to Mr. Rendal, the blood stains on the door jamb was from a year ago when his nephew punched out a window; this was later confirmed. Mr. Rendal also stated that when the officers bombarded into his house, he was startled by this and reached out his hands in a stopping motion because he thought someone was breaking into his house to harm him. Officer Kaufman charged Mr. Rendal with resisting arrest and obstructing official business for reaching out his hands in a stopping motion. This was also a justification that the officers used to brutalize Mr. Rendal.

A similar thing happened to Gilbert Rush Jr. a year or two ago when officers from Mansfield, and two or three other member cities of Richland County, bombarded into Mr. Rush's house without a "Knock and Notice" and unloaded rounds into Mr. Rush's body without logical justification. Furthermore, it was later reported that one of the officers stood over Mr. Rush's dead body and unloaded a round into his head. Gilbert Rush Jr. was an innocent man, as was later confirmed. This is the type of conduct that Dale C. Carson (a former F.B.I agent and former police officer) summarized in his book Arrest-Proof Yourself. He stated: "If cops start beating you, they have to charge you with resisting arrest. If they don't, they will be admitting to brutality." He further noted: "Crooked cops can plant guns and dope on you to make a felony bust or to justify having beaten or shot you." What a great summary of how crooked cops can be.

Sadly, 55 year old, Paul Rendal was the victim of the criminal justice system and police brutality. In the police Narrative Supplement, it stated that the officers used a grounding technique in order to get Mr. Rendal handcuffed. The police supplement report also claimed that Mr. Rendal was transported to MCM (Med Central Hospital) for a laceration on his forehead. But the prosecutors and police never said anything about the black eye and other injuries Mr. Rendal sustained during this entire affair. You don't get a black eye from a grounding technique. Paul claimed that the police hit him in the eye with a flashlight. This is the kind of conduct that the Justice Department -- if it believes in any justice -- should look into when it comes to protecting the citizens of the U.S. The Mansfield Police Department is very notorious for "police brutality," and it should be addressed immediately. Martin Yant, author of Rotten to the Core and Presumed Guilty, is a private investigator who lived in Mansfield for many years, exposed an enormous amount of corruption in Mansfield, which led to the conviction of a brutal sheriff and 7 deputies. Likewise, Martin Yant rendered several elected officials to step down from public offices. Because of this, he was threatened and ran out of Mansfield. He now lives in Columbus, Ohio. Learn more about Martin Yant at http://www.truthinjustice.org/yant/

Please leave a comment if this story in some way compelled you.

What about Felons

Note: The true archaic definition of the term "Felon" is as follows  (1) a malicious/ wicked person (2) or a traitor! The true meaning of this term (Felon) still has the same archaic meaning to the men who make law.

It's truly amazing to see what felons go through after paying their so-called debt to society. They are looked upon as the lowest elements of society, which justifies the disenfranchisement, demoralization, and dehumanization that they (felons) receive in this country called America. It would be intelligent on the felons' part to become politically conscious and demand that the U.S. government change its criminal disenfranchisement laws. It would also be intelligent of them to protest for their rights to be treated as human beings as long as they're citizens of the United States. Black people in particular should be very proactive in tackling this issue of disenfranchisement since they themselves make up 1.4 million of the disenfranchised population." With that said, it should register to black people to keep their hands out the illegal cookie-jar. Moreover, poor black people should be especially cautious about committing crimes, knowing that they're on the U.S. government's cross hairs.

Over 3.9 million U.S. citizens (felons) are disenfranchised from America's political and economic institutions. This is just another way of keeping regular, everyday people, mainly poor people, from having any economic or political power. Most of America's government officials are owners of, or part of, "private establishments" or "corporations!" This is truly why they favor the rich and ostracizes the poor. To prove my point, let us do our history! George Washington, one of America's founding fathers, had great affinity for aristocrats. Washington's wife, Martha Curtis, was one of the richest women in Virginia. That's probably why he married her. George Washington's closest crony, Alexander Hamilton, created policies that favored the upper classes. And not surprisingly, Washington and most of the founding fathers were owners of private property. Now everything has become clear as to why modern-day politicians give to the rich and take from the poor. Even in the early days of America, people who didn't own property (A.k.A. if you were poor) were not permitted to vote. But America is an equal and free society. Ho, ho, ho! What a joke!

It is mainly poor people who are "felons!" The ruling-class rich create laws/policies to ensure that it is only rich people who have civil and constitutional rights. They have created laws and structured certain institutions to ensure that it is only poor people who are susceptible to the felony laws; by virtue of this, they are able to justify taking away people's civil and constitutional rights, which they are born with anyway, regardless if a government give them those rights or not. What people are going to have to learn, especially Americans, is that no-one has the paternalistic right to neither give freedom nor take it away. And it's up to us (the people) to take our life, dignity, souls, and freedom back from the men who have taken all of that away from us in the first place.

Freedom is not free

Freedom is not free! And you can say that again. In reference to the aforementioned, there is nothing more vicious and offensive to a person's spirit than to confine a person to his/her house or track their every move by way of an electronic ankle bracelet. The electronic bracelet, however, is connected to a tracking device and this is how the Probation Department keeps track of its enslaved subjects. And that's not all; there's more! The cost to put this subjugational equipment (the electronic ankle bracelet and tracking device) into operation is paid at the enslaved subject's expense. The cost of this equipment may vary state to state; but in Ohio, the cost includes the following:

1) A one-time activation fee of $25.00

2) $9.00 per day

3) $63.00 per week

4) $270.00 per month

And the activation fee and the $270.00 for the first 30 days have to be paid before the house-arrest program is started. The point I'm trying to make here is that the powers-that-be is trying to make the house-arrest program seem like a cable company hook-up or something; as if they're hooking someone up with HBO or Cinamax. Wow! I'm happy to be hooked-up with your most precious electronic ankle bracelet and tracking device is the impression I'm getting from those who seek the house-arrest program to obtain outside imprisonment -- for a price that is. But seriously, the degree of ignorance that exist in America is very profound, and which explains why the ruling-class rich can make unjust laws/policies, tell lies, make people pay for their own enslavement, and still make people believe that they stay in an equal and free country. Isn't that compelling or what?

Moreover, I can tolerate ignorance to a certain degree but to be stupid is unacceptable. Prime examples of stupidity:

1) To be stupid is to pay $270.00 a month for one's own enslavement (house arrest).

2) To be stupid is to join the military to fight the rich man's war.

3) To be stupid is to believe everything that the media and Uncle Sam tells you.

4) To be stupid is to believe that you're free, when your country (America) has the highest imprisonment rate in the world.

5) To be stupid is to keep going to jail for the same thing, allowing the powers-that-be to lock you up and "use you as a source of income."

In reference to the aforementioned, people allow themselves to be used as cattle, which, in other words, they're willing to be sub-humans for their masters (the U.S. Government). The only way for one to free him/herself from this ignorance and exploitation is to unify, study, observe, and make the best intelligent decisions base upon what one knows and feels to liberate him/herself from "exploitation!"

Who benefits from the child-support scam

As I've said before in my previous articles, in the Mansfield News Journal, that no one benefits more than the government when it comes to any social problems due to racism, sexism, poverty, murder, etc. And the same goes for child support. Problems such as the aforementioned were scientifically created in order to keep the ruling-class rich in power. In fact, it's a scientific-social system designed to feed off of people's misery and plight, which keeps people (like little kids) relying on their government to compose their problems.

The child-support system would be a great system if it were truly designed to help children who live in single parent homes. Unfortunately, the child-support system is nothing more than a scam in which the U.S. government profits off of non-custodial parents. The U.S. government makes 1 to 2 percent -- and the last I heard 3 percent -- of all money through the child-support system. And to bring more insult to injury, the U.S. government allows people to establish "privately-owned" child-support agencies, which allows them to charge women a fee to catch so-called dead-beat dads, and that's not to mention the interest that they receive from each child-support payment. Likewise, that's why the government pursues child-support offenders so vigorously. What a scam! If a man buys his children something outside the child-support system, that's not considered a gift (as Uncle Sam deems it). That's called being a father! Every time a non-custodial parent makes a payment through the child-support agency, they always have to worry about the following issues:

1.) Is the mother/father going to support the children with the child support money, or is she/he going to spend it on him/herself or on his/her boyfriend or girlfriend?

2.) Will the child support agency make another billing error, which could possibly lead to jail time (which carries a felony, which should be a misdemeanor) or possibly more money that was already paid?

3.) Or will the money get there on time, or at all?

According to an august 2000 child support survey conducted by the American Coalition for Fathers and Children found that 55 percent of child-support payers have experienced billing errors from child-support agencies. Among those who tried to get the agency to fix the billing errors, 61 percent were unsuccessful. In 43 percent of these cases, the payers were subjected to punitive actions, such as having their cars booted or assets seized.

All of this is criminal and needs to be addressed with radical action! I (myself) will suggest a "vigorous" class-action lawsuit.