The Corrupt Child Support Industial Complex (Revisited)

This is child support in a nutshell

(pseudo alimony).

There are dozens of stories of people killing over child support – people who felt they were victimized by the Child-Support Program. Instead of people scratching their heads and admitting that something is wrong with the system, they want to defend the system by writing people off as being “crazy” or “psycho”, people who were driven mad and went off to kill their ex-wives, ex-husbands or kids. No one wants to see the system as the motivating factor behind the killings or dysfunction. I say look at the laws enforced by Child Support Enforcement Agencies and the Courts. Therefrom, we can get a clearer picture as to why child-support casualties transpire. Shamefully, the best people can do is say, "Those people are 'psycho' or 'crazy'." This is what people say anytime a killing strikes. No intellectual thoughts or investigations as to why people resort to murder. Therefore, nothing ever changes, and if something does change, it resulted from a slow and painful process. Why? Because many people in the majority do not read or do independent research and thus find themselves indoctrinated by government propaganda instead.
 
In the mix of all this child-support corruption and chicanery, the “states” are getting wages, funds and/or incentive money behind collecting and enforcing child support – plus a big healthy annual bonus to top it off. This incentive money is given to them by the federal government under, and pursuant to, Title IV-D of the Social Security Act and/or Title 42 U.S.C 658. Said incentives are the fire-starters of the corruption you see, today, in family courts. Hence, it is safe to say, from the evidence presented here, that children in the U.S. are being used as pawns and money-making machines by the State and many low-life custodial parents.
   
Lastly, just take a serious look at the chaos, murder and dysfunction the Child-Support Program produces (backed up by real headlines that I've acquired throughout the course of my research on the Child-Support Program), “Man ordered to pay child support for child that’s not his,” “Gunman kills 4 who collected child support payments,” “Man angry over child support kills mother of his children” and “Father goes to jail after over-paying child support”. As Neely Fuller Jr. once stated, "Any system that produces injustice is an unjust system."The Child-Support Program has produced egregious injustices. Most of the injustices on which I expounded in the aforesaid sentence cultivates the following: extortion, irresponsibility, promiscuity in young women, single-parent homes, chaos and murder. Since the State intentionally passes nonsense laws that ultimately create discord among human beings, whatever crimes are committed as a result of those laws, it is therefore right and/or correct to charge the State with those crimes.
 
If any of you are looking to beat the Child-Support System at its own game, follow this link: http://www.deltabravo.net/cms/plugins/content/content.php?content.162

The decline of two-parent homes have decimated this country

This produces....

.... This

If black people want to know what happened to their family structure and why they are worse off today than in the 1940s, ’50s and early ’60s, they can trace most of their woes directly to the federal government’s infiltration of the civil rights movement.

People like Gloria Steinem (a so-called feminist and former instrument of the CIA), Lyndon B. Johnson, Sen. Russell Long, Jimmy Carter and late Bill Clinton all had a hand in the destruction of the nuclear family, especially the black family. These people created the welfare state, the child support program and promoted single-mother homes. They also crafted diabolical welfare policies that set ablaze self-defeat. These people and their devilish polices started to manifest during and after the civil rights movement. Most of them were, and some still are, members of the Democratic Party, the party black people keep voting for. 

Black matriarchy/single-mother homes, black-on-black crime, chaos, intense poverty and illegitimate children increased as result of what was mentioned in the above paragraph. Now these same policies and programs — including radical feminism — are rapidly destroying white families as well, especially the lower and middle-class white families. No surprise.

Ever since the 1970s (the rise of the anti-two parent home), an influx of young men from single-mother homes (mostly black men) started to fill the prisons. This proves that fatherless homes have a profound and detrimental effect on young boys’ psyches. And the government knows this, by the way. Furthermore, in single-mother homes, young boys are not taught how to build and how to be an alpha male in an alpha world. Now, we can clearly see why so many black men function as they do in society.

Just look at the statistics with regards to black-on-black crime, single-mother homes, illegitimacy etc. You will find these woes drastically increased after the civil rights and feminist movements. Before these movements, only 9 percent of black families with children were headed by a single parent. It is obvious the solution to most of these problems is the two-parent home.

AUTHOR'S NOTE: This article was originally published in the Mansfield News Journal on July 19, 2014. The purpose of this article is to inform the human race about the consequences of producing and raising children without having the feminine and masculine aspects present. When one of these aspects are missing from a child’s life, what is left is an un-stabled child -- harsh but true.  It is very important that parents understand this. 


What the U.S. Government is trying to create is a matriarchy in all communities. Thus-far, looking at the black community, matriarchy has failed. This is why there is so much dysfunction in the black community, boys and girls being raised without the masculine aspect. And this will happen to other communities or races of people if they allow the government to root a matriarchy in their communities. Ghettos and dysfunction will follow. To prevent this, women must not be subsidized by the government to be single mothers or to be rewarded for producing multiple children they cannot financially support. Only through welfare (handouts) can the government produce or achieve such diabolical results.  

Your children are owned by the State

It's unsafe for people to have children in the United States. This is especially true for men. Every child born in the United States run a 95% chance of getting exploited by the United States government. With Social Services, Children Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement, Family Law Courts, Welfare, Birth Certificates, and Social Security Numbers, children are fundamentally "wards of the State". 

Parents may have biological relations with their children, and they may be parents biologically, but again, their children are "wards of the State". Their children belong to the government. If this is not true, why does the government have the ability or power to take people's children away? Why does the government have the ability or power to tell men how much they are going to pay for their children in a child support case? Why does the government have the ability or power to tell parents that they can't physically discipline their children? Because, the government owns the children. Once a mother or father signs a Birth Certificate and their children are given a Social Security Number (mark of the BEAST), their children are no longer theirs -- legally. 

For men, their children can be used to plunder them of money in a child support case. This generates revenue for the State (the Government -- Uncle Sam). Almost parallel to the father, children can be used against the mother in a so-called "child endangering case", a means by which the State can justify violating the mother's rights. 

These revelations or issues are profoundly unsettling. Do you want to know why? Because parents in the United States allow these issues to persist. In addition, parents spend too much time watching TV, watching sports, working, socializing, getting incarcerated, and letting the schools raise their children. Many parents in the United States have fundamentally given up their "best interest of the child", and they have let the State have the "best interest of the child". But the State never has the "best interest of the child", because the State doesn't have emotions or feelings. The State is an artificial person -- a legal fiction that serves its own interests. That's all it does.

For further reading, go to these sites:

Do You Own Your Children

http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/do-you-own-your-children/

Fighting For His Country (Child Support Robbery)

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=6283610

Social Security: Mark of the Beast

http://famguardian.org/Publications/SocialSecurity/TOC.htm

Please take a moment and make a small donation to my "FIGHT BACK!" blog-site. The PayPal donation button is on the sidebar of the site. Thanks!

Eve, stop being tricked and used by the Serpent (the government)

This is what's happening to families! 

Women should do their best to keep the biological father in the home, if he's a good man. They should not let the Serpent (the government) tempt them or trick them into leaving or disposing of the father in favor of welfare, child support, public housing, or whatever. The Serpent is always trying to trick or use Eve -- the woman. But it never uses or tricks Adam -- the man. The Serpent only goes after Eve. That's why women should always be leery of the Serpent (the government). If women are going to be "strong and independent", they  need to be strong and independent against the Serpent. Their husbands are the only ones that have their best interest, not the Serpent. Their children need their father. And the father needs to be in the same house, under the same roof.  This is essential for children's economic, social, and psychological well-being. Without the father, we will see more disrespectful, antisocial, and ungrateful children at an alarming rate. Studies have confirmed this.

The Serpent and its devilish welfare polices, corrupt family law courts, child-support-slave system, and no-fault divorce have done a good job at tempting and luring Eve in with these poisonous fruits -- fruits that are destroying her family. With over 72% of divorces initiated by women, the Serpent is being successful at using Eve (women). Because of this, fathers are being systematically removed from the home. Now, the Serpent (the government) is the new father, boyfriend, or husband. However, most of  the financial burden is still pushed onto the disenfranchised, biological father through the corrupt courts and through child support enforcement; no surprise there. 

Moreover, I utilized the Adam and Eve story (Genesis 3:1-24) from the Bible as a metaphor to illustrate what is happening to families in this country, and how certain women are being used to intentionally or unintentionally disintergrate their families. What has to happen now? Men and women -- especially men -- need to roll up their sleeves and tell the government to stay out of their business and out of certain aspects of domestic relations, especially concerning their children. 

Man, woman, and feminism

Ultimate Truth

I will begin this by saying that I am not an MRA (Men's Rights Activists). I am a human rights  activist. As such, I fight for the rights of all people. Secondly, I will not waste time sugar coating my words in reference to any issue. I am not in the business of appeasing anyone's likes or dislikes. Ultimate truth is the goal here. Now, let's begin.

Feminism, from my studying of it, started as noble movement and ultimately morphed into something very dangerous and divisive. As Winifried Holtby stated in 1928, "The New Feminism emphasizes the 'women's point of view,' the old Feminism believes in the primary importance of the human being." Feminism, as it stands today—like all other "isms" such as communism, racism, capitalism, fascism, and sexism—galvanizes frustration, hatred, and division among human beings.

Angry women who become feminists exploit the historical oppression of women as a way to justify their current-day resentment towards the opposite sex (men/boys); Some blacks and/or African-Americans do this as well when pointing out what whites did to them in the early days of America. And this is understandable to a degree.  But little do they know, this resentment— however—is being exploited by the very people (elitists) who were responsible for the oppression of women, blacks, poor whites, and a number of other nations/people throughout human history. Are you seeing the big picture now? Social engineering.... Order Out of Chaos.... Now you understand, right? OK.

The elitists knew that by oppressing certain people (and later semi-freeing them from their oppression) that it would have a future-backlash that would inevitably lead to a system of "divide" and "conquer." Note: the Elitists or Luciferians are a coalition of  men and women of many races, who are in the business of promoting, maintaining, redefining and expanding falsehood, division, non-justice and/or incorrectness. This must come to an end, soon!

Moreover, what the feminists have to understand is that their beliefs or "ism" are very dangerous in regards to true woman-hood, man-hood, and human nature. Feminists and their supporters should not try to turn women into men and men into women. To tamper with this, they are asking for big trouble. What I am saying here, everything in nature has a counterpart for a reason; these counterparts complement one another, which is essential to the preservation of balance. Once a counterpart is removed or distorted, it renders an imbalance which will inevitably lead to a catastrophic end for that which exists. Furthermore, balance is important, just as it is in every area of human activity; Balance also means justice. In addition, justice suggests that both men and women get punished the same, paid the same, and viewed the same (as human beings), while recognizing that there are certain biological and psychological differences between the two.

I also want to note, and emphasize, that women should not call themselves feminists if they are fighting for true equality. They should, by all means, call themselves human rights activists; this is the correct terminology to use when fighting for the rights of all people. This promotes true equality. Any doctrine that constitute the word "ism" should, at all time, provoke suspicion. Reason/explanation: Feminism, communism/socialism, capitalism, racism, fascism, and Zionism are all doctrines/beliefs/theories that have caused much agony, disarray, non-justice, and/or incorrectness among all people in the past and present-day world.

In addition, I believe that the feminists are very much aware of all of the above information. I also believe, without a doubt, that Gloria Steinem, Patricia Ireland, Susan Faludi, Catherine Mackinnon, and Jessica Valenti are women who have been gassed up with unreasonable anger; and this anger has allowed them to ignore facts and downplay the real causes of women's and men's suffrage. They should know, like I do, that fighting for one-half of the human race will not produce genuine equality; it will only create opposition. This opposition, ultimately, opens the devil's door, allowing the government to intervene. The government then swings the pendulum either too far to the "left" or too far to the "right." And this achieves nothing, and produces more strife and/or division. And this is what the elitists want. Avoid this at all costs.

NOTE: Learn the system. Learn not to be used as tools or implements. Learn to be full-fledged human beings! 

Feminism and sexism at its best

The face of feminism

I am a warrior against racism and sexism. Sexism, without question, is a big problem in the United States and the Western world and can no longer be ignored or tolerated. This post will confront one of the aforementioned issues (sexism) and will solely deal with the doctrine of feminism and its damaging effects on women and the family structure in the Western world. Furthermore, I want young women to fully  understand the difference between feminism and women's liberation.

Women's liberation is define as an idea or belief that freedom, rights, and equality are fought for and extended to women. Feminism on the other hand, through my observation, is a doctrine of aggression, frustration, and hate geared toward men; there is another word for it—misandry!

Feminism has nothing to do with women's rights, even though it appears that way. It's an advocation of female supremacy and male emasculation. In addition, the feminists or Femi-Nazis are against any woman or man who go against their ideas or agendas. For example, when men express their sentiments on how the rape-shield laws, divorce courts, family courts, and domestic violence laws discriminate against men and favor women, the feminists (including male feminists) will argue that those men are misogynists and don't want women to have rights. This sort of argument is used every time a man opens his mouth about his suffering at the hands of unjust, misandric laws. But these shaming tactics no longer work, because men are now speaking out, increasingly. They are no longer hiding their pain and dissatisfaction with this "misandric" and "Satanic" system.  

Moreover, after the feminist movement ... divorce went up and the family structure in America started to falter. The black community definitely suffered from this. Black women who are feminists don't necessarily call themselves feminists; the word "feminist" is replaced with the phrase "Strong, Independent Black Woman." These are the most aggressive, bitter, and hot-headed black women you will ever encounter. White feminists on the other hand are the ones influencing change in laws and politics that have led to men paying high child support payments for kids that are not theirs and has led to men losing 85% of divorce settlements. The family courts and divorce courts are an apparatus used to brutalize and extract money from men, because it has been influenced by feministic ideas. No one can deny that. It has gotten so bad that even women are starting to speak out against it.

Furthermore, this is the real reason why men don't want to get married anymore. They are sitting back looking at all the male athletes, movie stars, singers, and other successful males get raped financially in divorce settlements. If no one believes this phenomenon is happening, just follow this link: http://youtu.be/Mveau6rGTM0  

Most of the mind-games, hatred, and aggression you see coming from young women of today is a result of radical feminists' ideas and influence. Enough said!

Note: Do not assume that divorce is initiated by men or caused by men. 70 to 75% of divorces are initiated by women. Women are given incentives to leave their boyfriends  or husbands. This comes in the form of Alimony, Child Support, Welfare, and other government incentives, which is enough to trigger women to divorce or breakup with their boyfriends/husbands in hope of reaping these financial benefits from either their husbands or the state. This is why young men in Western World countries should not get married until the current legal climate changes.

 Please be advised: This post has been revised and/or updated for accurate reading.